Optimizing SCoT-PCR Parameters for Reproducible Genetic Diversity Analysis in Cassava, Rice, Maize, and Foxtail Millet

Authors

  • Yudiansyah Yudiansyah Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB University, Indonesia
  • Ismiyanti Ismiyanti Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB University, Indonesia
  • Susilawati Susilawati Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB University, Indonesia
  • M Reza Pahlevi Plant Breeding and Biotechnology Study Program, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB University, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6807-8302
  • Sintho Wahyuning Ardie Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB University, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0563-1373

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29244/jtcs.13.02.494-503

Keywords:

marker informativeness, molecular marker, polymerase chain reaction, protocol, reproducibility

Abstract

Technical optimization of PCR parameters is essential to ensure efficiency and accuracy in genetic analyses. The performance and reproducibility of Start Codon Targeted (SCoT) markers are strongly influenced by annealing temperature (Ta) and primer concentration. Raising Ta from 50 °C to 55 °C reduced both amplicon yield and reproducibility, whereas higher primer concentrations increased amplicon counts without substantially affecting reproducibility. Optimal amplification was achieved at Ta 50 °C with a primer concentration of 2.5 μM, where most primers produced high amplicon numbers with 100% reproducibility. Evaluation of 36 SCoT primers in foxtail millet identified 20 primers with full reproducibility, of which 10 were further tested across cassava, rice, and maize. Primer reproducibility varied among species, and only SCoT‑35 and SCoT-36 consistently achieved 100% reproducibility across all three crops. These results highlight that primer suitability is species‑dependent and emphasize the need for extensive primer screening in each plant species. Overall, optimizing Ta and primer concentrations, combined with careful primer selection, is essential for the reliable, efficient, and cost-effective application of SCoT markers in plant genetic diversity analysis.

References

Aboul-Maaty, N.A.F., & Oraby, H.A.S. (2019). Extraction of high-quality genomic DNA from different plant orders by applying a modified CTAB-based method. Bulletin of the National Research Centre, 43, 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-019-0066-1

Altaf, M. T., Nadeem, M. A., Ali, A., Liaqat, W., Bedir, M., Baran, N., Ilić, A., Ilyas, M. K., Ghafoor, A., Dogan, H., Aasim, M., & Baloch, F. S. (2025). Applicability of start codon targeted (SCoT) markers for assessment of genetic diversity in wheat germplasm. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 72, 1205–1218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-024-02016-0

Amiteye, S. (2021). Basic concepts and methodologies of DNA marker systems in plant molecular breeding. Heliyon, 7(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08093

Atienzar, F., Evenden, A., Jha, A., Savva, D., & Depledge, M. (2000). Optimized RAPD analysis generates high-quality genomic DNA profiles at high annealing temperature. BioTechniques, 28(1), 52– 54. https://doi.org/10.2144/00281bm09

Babu, K. N., Sheeja, T. E., Minoo, D., Rajesh, M. K., Samsudeen, K., Suraby, E. J., & Kumar, I. P. V. (2020). Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and derived techniques. In P. Besse (Ed.), Molecular Plant Taxonomy: Methods and Protocols (pp. 219-247). Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0997-2_13

Bennetzen, J. L., Schmutz, J., Wang, H., Percifield, R., Hawkins, J., Pontaroli, A. C., Estep, M., Feng, L., Vaughn, J. N., Grimwood, J., Jenkins, J., Barry, K., Lindquist, E., Hellsten, U., Deshpande, S., Wang, X., Wu, X., Mitros, T., Triplett, J., Yang, X., …. Devos, K. M. (2012). Reference genome sequence of the model plant Setaria. Nature Biotechnology 30, 555–561. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2196

Bidyananda, N., Jamir, I., Nowakowska, K., Varte, V., Vendrame, W. A., Devi, R. S., & Nongdam, P. (2024). Plant genetic diversity studies: Insights from DNA marker analyses. International Journal of Plant Biology, 15(3), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijpb15030046

Chňapek, M., Balážová, Ž., Špaleková, A., Gálová, Z., Hromadová, Z., Číšecká, L., & Vivodík, M. (2024). Genetic diversity of maize resources revealed by different molecular markers. Genet Resources and Crop Evolution, 71, 4685–4703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-024-01908-5

Collard, B. C. Y., & Mackill, D. J. (2009). Start codon targeted (SCoT) polymorphism: A simple, novel DNA marker technique for generating gene-targeted markers in plants. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 27(1), 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-008-0060-5

Enan, M. R. (2008). Evaluation of nonanchored inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) marker to detect DNA damage in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) exposed to acrylamide. Journal of Forest Science, 24(2), 61–68.

Hasan, N., Choudhary, S., Naaz, N., Sharma, N., & Laskar, R. A. (2021). Recent advancements in molecular marker-assisted selection and applications in plant breeding programmes. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, 19(1), 128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141021-00231-1

Hudak, A., & Dybdahl, M. (2023). Phenotypic plasticity under the effects of multiple environmental variables. Evolution, 77(6), 1370-1381. https://doi.org/10.1093/evolut/qpad049

International Rice Genome Sequencing Project & Sasaki, T. (2005). The map-based sequence of the rice genome. Nature, 436(7052), 793-800. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03895

Jannah, R. M., Ratnawati, S., Suwarno, W. B., & Ardie, S. W. (2024). Digital phenotyping for robust seeds variability assessment in Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv. Journal of Seed Science, 46, e202446012. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1545v46281586

Mubarok, A. F., Purwantomo, S., Suwanto, A., Reflinur, & Ardie, S. W. (2025). SNAP markers for pyramided yield and BLB resistance genes in rice. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 25(4): e534425411. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-70332025v25n4a56

Nitiworakarn, S., Phae-Ngam, W., & Vanijajiva, O. (2023). Molecular evaluation of genetic diversity and relationships of Musa cultivars in Thailand using start codon targeted (SCoT) markers. Biodiversitas, 24(7), 4060–4068. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d240744

Prochnik, S., Marri, P. R., Desany, B., Rabinowicz, P. D., Kodira, C., Mohiuddin, M., Rodriguez, F., Fauquet, C., Tohme, J., Harkins, T., Rokhsar, D. S., & Rounsley, S. (2012). The cassava genome: Current progress, future directions. Tropical Plant Biology, 5(1), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12042-011-9088-z

Ragab, O. G., El Kholy, D. M., Elkhiat, S. M., Mohamed, A. H., & Khafagi, A. A. (2025). Taxonomic significance of morphological and molecular variation in Egyptian Malvaceae species. BMC Plant Biology, 25(1), 646. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-06609-4

Rai, M. K. (2023). Start codon targeted (SCoT) polymorphism marker in plant genome analysis: current status and prospects. Planta, 257(2), 34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-023-040676

Safitri, V. A., Fatimah, F., Wahyu, Y., Ardie, S. W., & Mahrup, M. (2026). Evaluation of agronomic performance and genetic diversity in Indonesian pigmented rice using SCoT (Start Codon Targeted) markers. HAYATI Journal of Biosciences, 33(1), 103-113. https://doi.org/10.4308/hjb.33.1.103-113

Salgotra, R. K., & Stewart, C. N. Jr. (2020). Functional markers for precision plant breeding. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(13), 4792. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21134792

Santoso, T. J., Husni, A., Nugroho, K., Ya’la, Z. R., Dewi, T., Marhawati, M., Maemunah, M., Rosyida, E., & Ndobe, S. (2024). Optimization of PCR analysis based on start codon targeted markers (SCoT markers) for the identification of genetic variation of seaweed from Central Sulawesi. Journal La Lifesci, 5(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.37899/journallalifesci.v5i1.1062

Schnable, P. S., Ware, D., Fulton, R. S., Stein, J. C., Wei, F., Pasternak, S., Liang, C., Zhang, J., Fulton, L., Graves, T. A., Minx, P., Reily, A. D., Courtney, L., Kruchowski, S. S., Tomlinson, C., Strong, C., Delehaunty, K., Fronick, C., Courtney, B., Rock, S. M., ... Wilson, R. K. (2009). The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science, 326(5956), 1112–1115. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1178534

Sharma, V., & Thakur, M. (2021). Applicability of SCoT markers for detection of variations in Fusarium yellows resistant lines of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) induced through gamma irradiations. South African Journal of Botany, 140, 454–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2021.01.021

Shehata, D. H., El-Mahdy, M. M., Ibrahim, M., El Araby, M. M., El-Akkad, S. S., & Ellmouni, F. Y. (2025). Analytical assessment of physical characteristics, metabolic processes, and molecular investigations of selected wheat (Triticum spp.) cultivars. BMC Plant Biology, 25(1), 1067. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-07134-0

Vanijajiva, O. (2020). Start codon-targeted (SCoT) polymorphism reveals genetic diversity in Manilkara in Thailand. Biodiversitas, 21(2), 666–673. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d210232

Wospakrik, A. H., Rizqullah, R., Pahlevi, M. R., Yudiansyah, Purwoko, B. S., Suwarno, W. B., Ardie, S. W. (2026). Improved performance of SiDREB2-SNAP marker in foxtail millet by optimum primer concentration, PCR cycle, and DNA polymerase specificity. Journal of Tropical Crop Science, 13(01), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.29244/jtcs.13.01.103-113

Downloads

Published

2026-06-25

How to Cite

Yudiansyah, Y., Ismiyanti, I., Susilawati, S., Pahlevi, M. R., & Ardie, S. W. (2026). Optimizing SCoT-PCR Parameters for Reproducible Genetic Diversity Analysis in Cassava, Rice, Maize, and Foxtail Millet. Journal of Tropical Crop Science, 13(02), 494–503. https://doi.org/10.29244/jtcs.13.02.494-503