Effect of Herbicides and Azotobacter chroococcum Bacteria on Soil Bacterial Growth, Growth, and Yield of Maize (Zea mays L.)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29244/jtcs.13.01.254-267Keywords:
biological treatment, bioremedia tion, chlorpyrifos degradation, herbicide detoxifi cation, maize, soil microbiologyAbstract
To obtain high yield, herbicides are applied to food crops, including maize. It is important to adopt sustainable agricultural practices to enhance soil fertility by bacterial inoculation. Two experiments were conducted at the Faculty of Agriculture, University of Kufa, Iraq, to investigate the effects of glyphosate and 2,4 D herbicides on soil bacterial activity, growth, and maize (Zea mays L.) yield. A laboratory experiment, using a completely randomized design, evaluated the response of Azotobacter chroococcum and Bacillus subtilis to varying herbicide concentrations. Bacterial populations were quantified after 24 hr of incubation to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration within the nutrient medium. Subsequently, a f ield experiment was conducted in a sandy loam soil during the 2024–2025 autumn season using a randomized complete block design; the factors included bacterial inoculation and herbicide application at three rates: half, full (recommended), and double the recommended dose. Results indicated that high concentrations of glyphosate and 2,4-D significantly reduced total bacterial counts to 3.50 × 10⁶ CFU/g dry soil. Conversely, inoculation with A. chroococcum increased the population to 18.83 × 10⁶ CFU/g, with the interaction between A. chroococcum and the recommended glyphosate dose achieving the highest density of 37.00 × 10⁶ CFU/g. Regarding plant physiology, inoculation increased total chlorophyll content from 1.33 to 1.68 mg/g and leaf area from 415.34 to 879.71 cm2 per plant. Leaf nutrient concentrations also improved significantly; nitrogen rose from 1.18% to 2.08%, phosphorus from 0.17% to 0.23%, and potassium from 1.26% to 1.50%. These improvements were reflected in vegetative growth and productivity; the dry weight of the vegetative system increased from 199.25 g in uninoculated controls to 278.36 g in the full-recommended glyphosate treatment with inoculation. Total grain yield ranged from 12.31 to 16.29 t/ha, with A. chroococcum inoculation alone reaching a mean yield of 15.57 t/ha.
References
Al-Budairy, Z. J., & Al-Taweel, L. S. (2025). Impact of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, white fungus waste, and nano fertilizer on pyrophosphatase activity, growth characteristics, and yield of stevia plant. Scientia Agropecuaria, 16(3), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2025.027
Alfalahi, A. A., Al-Abodi, H. M. K., Abdul Jabbar, B. K., Mundi, A. M., & Sulman, K. A. (2015). Scheduling irrigation as a water-saving practice for corn (Zea mays L.) production in Iraq. International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences, 1(3), 55–59. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20150103.12
Al-Jabouri, B. A. K., Hasawi, G. S. A., & Al Jalabi, F. T. (1985). Jungles and methods of combating them. Technical Institute Foundation – Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research.
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. (2000). Official methods of analysis (17th ed.). AOAC.
Ayana, D. (2023). Effect of selected weed control methods for the management of weeds in maize in different agro-ecological zones of Ethiopia. International Journal of Research Studies in Agricultural Sciences, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.20431/2454-6224.0911002
Bastakoti, B., & Shrestha, S. (2025). Impacts of Azotobacter inoculation on hybrid maize growth and yield. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 27(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.17957/IJAB/15.1511706
Black, C. A. (1965). Methods of soil analysis: Part I & II. American Society of Agronomy. Central Organization for Agricultural Statistics. (2023). Cereal and maize production. Ministry of Planning, Iraq. http://www.cosit.gov.iq/ar/agri-stat-veg-prod
Chennappa, G., Adkar-Purushothama, C. R., & Sreenivasa, M. Y. (2016). PGPR, abiotic stress tolerance, and antifungal activity of Azotobacter sp. isolated from paddy soils. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, 54(5), 322–331. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27321965
Curran, W. S. (1998). Persistence of herbicides in soil. Pennsylvania State University, College of Agricultural Sciences.
Dikici, H., & Dundar, G. D. (2006). Wheat weed competition for nutrients in Kahramanmaras, Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 9(3), 341–344. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2006.341.344
Elsahookie, M. M., Cheyed, S.H. & Dawood, A. A. (2021). Estimating maize ear grain yields on the farm. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Science. 525(1): 1219-1224. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31688.06401
Ganie, Z. A., & Jhala, A. J. (2021). Glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid contents in field crops soils under various weed management practices. Agronomy Journal, 113(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20647
Ghazi, R. M., Nik Yusoff, N. R., Halim, N. S. A., Wahab, I. R. A., Latif, N. A., Hasmoni, S. H., Zaini, M. A. A., & Zakaria, Z. A. (2023). Health effects of herbicides and their current removal strategies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(15), 12345–12360. https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2023.22-59526
Jones, J. B., Jr., Wolf, B., & Mills, H. A. (1991). Plant analysis handbook: A practical sampling, preparation, analysis, and interpretation guide. Publishing. Micro-Macro Kommireddy, A., & Poojitha, M. (2017). Weed and nutrient dynamics in maize as influenced by different weed management practices. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 9(2), 1–8.
Muhamed, F. M., & Nuni, G. B. (2024). The effect of inoculation with local isolates of Azotobacter chroococcum bacteria and levels of chelated iron on the growth and yield of Zea mays L. Euphrates Journal of Agricultural Science, 16(4), 57–68.
Ofosu, R., et al. (2023). Herbicide resistance: Managing weeds in a changing climate. Agronomy, 13(6), 1595. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13061595
Rejali, F., & Baghery, M. (2021). Response of yield and yield components of maize (Zea mays L.) to different biofertilizers and chemical fertilizers. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265882655
Santos, V. L., & Linardi, V. R. (2004). Biodegradation of phenol by a filamentous fungus isolated from industrial effluent. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 35(3), 248–253. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822004000200017
Sharma, S. B., Sayyed, R. Z., Trivedi, M. H., & Gobi, T. A. (2013). Phosphate-solubilizing microbes: A sustainable approach for managing phosphorus deficiency in agricultural soils. SpringerPlus, 2, Article 587. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-587
Singh, R., & Sharma, P. (2022). Synergistic effect of Azotobacter nigricans and nitrogen phosphorus fertilization on maize growth and yield. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, Article 952212. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.952212
Song, Y., Li, Z., Liu, J., Zou, Y., Lv, C., & Chen, F. (2022). The efficacy of Azotobacter chroococcum in altering maize plant defence responses to armyworm at elevated CO₂ concentration. Frontiers in Microbiology, 13, Article 1015721. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1015721
Tomkiel, M., & Kwiatkowska, M. (2023). Exposure to three herbicide mixtures influenced maize root-associated microbial communities. Science of the Total Environment, 857, Article 159384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159384
Ubogu, M., & Akponah, E. (2022). In vitro effect of glyphosate and 2,4-D amine herbicides on diazotrophic bacteria (Azotobacter and Bradyrhizobium species). Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 26(4), 543–548. https://doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v26i4.9
Wei, X., Zhang, H., & Li, X. (2024). Enhancing soil health and plant growth through microbial inoculation. Agronomy, 14(3), 609. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14030609
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All publications by Journal of Tropical Crop Science is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
